Department Policies
|
| Title: | Contributed Service Faculty Appointments and Renewals | Policy #: AA-03 |
| Authorized Signature: | Review Date: | |
| Authorized Signature Revised: | Associate Chairs | Revision Date: 11-5-99 |
| Authorized Signature Origination: | Syed Mohiuddin, M.D. | Origination Date 8-23-99 |
Candidate's names are provided to the Coordinator for
Academic Affairs for processing.
1.
The name of
faculty candidate is submitted to the Coordinator for Academic Affairs. This
may be done by the curriculum coordinator, division chiefs, associate chairs,
or chair.
2.
The
Coordinator for Academic Affairs will send the faculty application forms to the
candidate for completion. [Attachment #1]
3.
When the
completed application form is returned, the Coordinator will request letters of
recommendation from those listed on the application.
4.
The
Coordinator will send a copy of the material submitted along with the form for Review
of New Contributed Service Faculty Appointments to the appropriate division
chief. [Attachment #2 &
#3]
5.
After the
return of the new Review form from the division chief, the Coordinator will:
(a)
make copies
to forward on to the Associate Chairs (Option 1); or
(b)
after all
of the letters of recommendation are received, a copy of the complete
application dossier will be again sent to the division chief with another
Review form (Option 2); or
(c)
send the
application along with the Review form to the Associate Chair for Academic
Affairs for review (Option 3).
6.
Option 1, after review by the Associate Chairs,
the Chair's letter will be prepared for review by the Chair. After the Chair
signs the appropriate pages, the entire dossier will be copied and sent to the
Medical Dean's Office for approval by the Executive Committee.
7.
Option 2, after the division chief reviews the
application and the letters of recommendation, Option 1 or Option 3 are the
only choices.
8.
Option 3, after the Associate Chair for Academic
Affairs has reviewed the application, this material may be reviewed by the
Associate Chairs and/or the Chair before anything else is done.
9.
If the
Associate Chairs and the Chair agree that this applicant should not become a
faculty member in the Department of Medicine, a letter needs to be sent to the
applicant stating a plausible reason for not giving an appointment. (The
Associate Chair has a draft of a basic letter that can be modified where
appropriate.)
1. The Coordinator for Academic Affairs prepares a list of the faculty due for 3 year review. This list is sent to the Division Chiefs asking if they want to have these faculty renew their appointments.
2. The
Coordinator for Academic Affairs (Mary Ann Scramstad) prepares a letter to send
to the faculty member who is due for renewal of contributed service appointment
Along with the letter, a form has been developed for the faculty member to
complete. The choices are "NO, I do not wish to renew my faculty
appointment" or "Yes, I do want to renew..." [Attachment #4]
3. Faculty
member is to return the form for either choice. If they wish to renew, then
they are asked to answer some questions about their activities in relation to
Creighton University. They are also asked to submit copies of a current CV,
current Federal and State DEA, current medical license and copy of malpractice
insurance.
4. After
receipt of the form from the faculty member, a memo form is sent to the
Division Chief for approval of reappointment If there is no response from the
faculty member, another letter with the form will be sent out.
5.
If
the 2 letters that were sent to the faculty member did not get a response, the
Coordinator for Academic Affairs will send to the Division Chief a copy of the
letters that were sent to the faculty member. A cover memo will be sent to the
Division Chief indicating the choices the Division Chief has. The return memo
to the Coordinator indicating that the division chief will attempt to get a
response from the faculty member or the division chief is requesting that the
faculty member NOT be reappointed. [Attachment #5]
6.
The
response from the division chief will be presented to the Associate Chairs for
review.
7.
The
response from the chief and associate chairs will be presented to the Council
of Division Chiefs for approval.
8.
A
Chair's letter will be prepared according to the decision of the Council. If
the Council agrees with NOT renewing the appointment, a Chair's letter to the
faculty member is prepared indicating why the appointment was not renewed.
9.
For non-renewal, the Chair's letter to the
Dean and a copy of the Chair's letter to the faculty member are sent to the
Medical Dean's Office. At this point, the School does not send a letter to the
faculty member and neither does the University saying their appointment was NOT
renewed. The only letter informing them of this is the chair's letter.
10.
The
Medical Dean's Office then sends the information to the President's office for
their records.
11.
For renewal, the Chair's letter, along
with the material provided by the faculty member is sent to the Medical Dean's
Office for presenting to the Executive Committee. Upon approval by that
committee, the dossier is forwarded to Dean's office. Upon approval by the
Dean, a letter is sent to the faculty member with a copy being sent to the
Chair indicating renewal and the next review date.
[Mission
Statement]
[Deans'
Office] - [Medical School Admissions] -
[Students] -
[Student Affairs]
- [Alumni]
[Creighton
Medicine] - [Creighton
University]
[Comments
to Webmaster]
Contact information: lbier@creighton.edu
Updated 12/06